Strict liability is best defined as

Strict liability is best defined as

• A. Liability based on negligence
• B. Liability arising from contract
• C. Liability due to intentional acts
• D. Liability without regard to fault

Answer: (D)

Strict liability means responsibility for harms caused by certain activities or products without regard to fault or intent. You don’t have to prove negligence, intent to cause harm, or a breached contract; simply the fact that the injury resulted from the activity or product is enough to impose liability. This contrasts with negligence (requires showing a failure to exercise reasonable care), contract-based liability (arises from failing to uphold a contractual duty), and intentional acts (involves deliberate wrongdoing). In practice, strict liability is often applied in ultra-hazardous activities and some product liability cases, where the mere fact of harm makes the party liable.

Strict liability means responsibility for harms caused by certain activities or products without regard to fault or intent. You don’t have to prove negligence, intent to cause harm, or a breached contract; simply the fact that the injury resulted from the activity or product is enough to impose liability. This contrasts with negligence (requires showing a failure to exercise reasonable care), contract-based liability (arises from failing to uphold a contractual duty), and intentional acts (involves deliberate wrongdoing). In practice, strict liability is often applied in ultra-hazardous activities and some product liability cases, where the mere fact of harm makes the party liable.